A rebreathing method to determine carbon monoxide diffusing capacity in children: Reference values for six 18-year-olds and validation in adult volunteers

1998 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-212 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Stam ◽  
A. v. d. Beek ◽  
K. Grünberg ◽  
M. A. J. de Ridder ◽  
J. C. de Jongste ◽  
...  
1965 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 99-102 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. S⊘lvsteen

We have calculated how the carbon monoxide concentration changes when subjects with different distributions of ventilation and lung diffusing capacity (Dl) respire in a small bag. The curve [loge CO concentration in the bag] versus [time] will sooner or later appear as a straight line. Dl is calculated from the slope of the rectilinear section of the curve and from lung and bag volume. If the curve becomes rectilinear within the period considered, Dl is calculated too low. In some cases the curve will not be rectilinear until more than 45 sec have passed, but will appear to be rectilinear during the period from 30 to 45 sec. If such an experiment is discontinued when 45 sec (the usual duration of experiment) have passed, Dl can be calculated at too high, at correct, or at too low values. nonuniform distribution of lung diffusing capacity Submitted on February 18, 1964


1959 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 2073-2086 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin M. Lewis ◽  
Tai-Hon Lin ◽  
Frances E. Noe ◽  
Ernest J. Hayford-Welsing ◽  
Erma Flaherty

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 240-247 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura Gochicoa-Rangel ◽  
Rodrigo Del-Río-Hidalgo ◽  
María René Álvarez-Arroyo ◽  
David Martínez-Briseño ◽  
Uri Mora-Romero ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
pp. e0245434
Author(s):  
Pierre-Marie Wardyn ◽  
Virginie de Broucker ◽  
Cécile Chenivesse ◽  
Annie Sobaszek ◽  
Richard Van Bulck ◽  
...  

Background The single-breath diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) interpretation needs the comparison of measured values to reference values. In 2017, the Global Lung Function Initiative published new reference values (GLI-2017) for DLCO, alveolar volume (VA) and transfer coefficient of the lung for carbon monoxide (KCO). We aimed to assess the applicability of GLI-2017 reference values for DLCO on a large population by comparing them to the European Community of Steel and Coal equations of 1993 (ECSC-93) widely used. Methods In this retrospective study, spirometric indices, total lung capacity, DLCO, VA and KCO were measured in adults classified in 5 groups (controls, asthma, chronic bronchitis, cystic fibrosis, and interstitial lung diseases (ILD)). Statistical analysis comparing the 2 equations sets were stratified by sex. Results 4180 tests were included. GLI-2017 z-scores of the 3 DLCO indices of the controls (n = 150) are nearer to 0 (expected value in a normal population) than ECSC-93 z-scores. All groups combined, in both genders, DLCO GLI-2017 z-scores and %predicted are significantly higher than ECSC z-scores and %predicted. In the ILD group, differences between the 2 equation sets depend on the DLCO impairment severity: GLI-2017 z-scores are higher than ECSC z-scores in patients with no or “mild” decrease in DLCO, but are lower in “moderate” or “severe” decrease. Conclusion GLI-2017 reference values for DLCO are more suitable to our population and influence the diagnostic criteria and severity definition of several lung diseases.


2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
pp. 252-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Bomholt ◽  
Sara Larsson ◽  
Marianne Rix ◽  
Sarah Rytter ◽  
Bo Feldt‐Rasmussen ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 104 (4) ◽  
pp. 1094-1100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia Verbanck ◽  
Daniel Schuermans ◽  
Sophie Van Malderen ◽  
Walter Vincken ◽  
Bruce Thompson

It has long been assumed that the ventilation heterogeneity associated with lung disease could, in itself, affect the measurement of carbon monoxide transfer factor. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential estimation errors of carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DlCO) measurement that are specifically due to conductive ventilation heterogeneity, i.e., due to a combination of ventilation heterogeneity and flow asynchrony between lung units larger than acini. We induced conductive airway ventilation heterogeneity in 35 never-smoker normal subjects by histamine provocation and related the resulting changes in conductive ventilation heterogeneity (derived from the multiple-breath washout test) to corresponding changes in diffusing capacity, alveolar volume, and inspired vital capacity (derived from the single-breath DlCO method). Average conductive ventilation heterogeneity doubled ( P < 0.001), whereas DlCO decreased by 6% ( P < 0.001), with no correlation between individual data ( P > 0.1). Average inspired vital capacity and alveolar volume both decreased significantly by, respectively, 6 and 3%, and the individual changes in alveolar volume and in conductive ventilation heterogeneity were correlated ( r = −0.46; P = 0.006). These findings can be brought in agreement with recent modeling work, where specific ventilation heterogeneity resulting from different distributions of either inspired volume or end-expiratory lung volume have been shown to affect DlCO estimation errors in opposite ways. Even in the presence of flow asynchrony, these errors appear to largely cancel out in our experimental situation of histamine-induced conductive ventilation heterogeneity. Finally, we also predicted which alternative combination of specific ventilation heterogeneity and flow asynchrony could affect DlCO estimate in a more substantial fashion in diseased lungs, irrespective of any diffusion-dependent effects.


1981 ◽  
Vol 51 (4) ◽  
pp. 858-863 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. L. Stokes ◽  
N. R. MacIntyre ◽  
J. A. Nadel

To study the effects of exercise on pulmonary diffusing capacity, we measured the lungs' diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) during exhalation from 30 to 45% exhaled vital capacity in eight healthy subjects at rest and during exercise while both sitting and supine. We found that DLCO at these lung volumes in resting subjects was 26.3 +/- 3.2% (mean +/- SE) higher in the supine than in the sitting position (P less than 0.001). We also found that, in both positions, DLCO at these lung volumes increased significantly (P less than 0.001) with increasing exercise and approached similar values at maximal exercise. The pattern of increase in DLCO with an increase in oxygen consumption in both positions was curvilinear in that the rate of increase in DLCO during mild exercise was greater than the rate of increase in DLCO during heavy exercise (P = 0.02). Furthermore, in the supine position during exercise, it appeared that DLCO reached a physiological maximum.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document